Posts Tagged ‘Grandparent Rights’

another shot to grandparent visitation rights

Friday, March 25th, 2011

In previous posts I have talked about the diminishing rights of grandparents to sue for visitation in Texas.  They were titled “grandparent’s right in Texas” and a continuation of that article followed.  Over the years, the Texas Legislature has continued to chip away any rights that a grandparent had or had in seeking visitation of their grandchild when the parent denies access.

There is a bill pending before the house committee (House Bill 2557) that will further erode any rights left for grandparents.  If this bill passes, this could be the final nail in the coffin (should I use that term here?) :) for grandparent visitation rights.

You can read the bill here: House Bill 2557.

There is a serious backlash coming from the legal community on this one.  We’ll see what happens.  Grandparents, if you oppose this bill, contact your local legislator and express your objection to this bill.

grandparent’s rights in texas (Cont.)

Thursday, January 31st, 2008

In my last post we discussed a very brief background of the evolution of grandparent’s rights in Texas. Now I will provide you with a brief synopsis of the law as it currently stands. The information below is taken from the Texas Family Code and an excellent article written by Jimmy L. Verner, Jr. of Verner & Brumley, P.C. I really like the way Mr. Brumley organized and explained the current law as it relates to grandparent’s visitation with their grandchildren. I have made a few changes to the wording to try and simplify the legal jargon. I wanted to put a direct link to the article in this post, but it appears the link is broken on their website. This is the link to their “Resources” page where the article is located. There is tons of good information on this page.

Managing Conservatorship

Grandparents can seek managing conservatorship of a grandchild by original suit or intervention if one or more of the circumstances listed below exist. Managing conservatorship typically means custody in this type of case, but does not have to mean that. It could simply mean that the grandparent has rights to make decisions regarding the grandchild’s upbringing. An “intervention” means that there is already a lawsuit pending regarding the child and they simply joins the lawsuit.

  1. They have had actual care, control and possession of the grandchild for at least six months ending not more than 90 days preceding the date of filing the lawsuit. (The 90 day requirement ensures that the 6 month possession was recent and not years and years ago); OR
  2. The grandchild and the grandchild’s guardian, managing conservator, or parent have resided with the grandparent for at least 6 months ending not more than 90 days prior to filing the lawsuit IF the child’s guardian, managing conservator, or parent is deceased at the time of the filing of the lawsuit; OR
  3. The grandchild’s present circumstances would significantly impair the grandchild’s physical health or emotional development (meaning that where the child currently lives with the parent presents a danger to the child either emotionally or physically) ; OR
  4. Both the grandchild’s parents, the surviving parent, or the managing conservator either filed the lawsuit for the grandparent to have managing conservatorship or have agreed to it.

If any of the above four exists then there may be a case for seeking custody or visitation of the grandchild.

Possessory Conservatorship

A grandparent may seek possessory conservatorship of a grandchild by original suit or intervention if one or more of the circumstances listed below exists. Possessory conservatorship is NOT custody and would be more like a visitation lawsuit. However, it differs from a visitation lawsuit in that they may be granted certain rights with regard to the upbringing of the grandchild.

Original Lawsuit OR Intervention

  1. The grandparent has had actual care, control and possession of the grandchild for at least six months ending not more than 90 days preceding the date of filing the lawsuit. (The 90 day requirement ensures that the 6 month possession was recent and not years and years ago); OR
  2. The grandchild and the grandchild’s guardian, managing conservator, or parent have resided with the grandparent for at least 6 months ending not more than 90 days prior to filing the lawsuit IF the child’s guardian, managing conservator, or parent is deceased at the time of the filing of the lawsuit;

The above two allow the grandparent to file and original suit or an intervention for possessory conservatorship if either is met.

ONLY an Intervention

A grandparent can file ONLY an intervention for possessory conservatorship if the following two are met:

  1. They have had substantial past contact with the child; AND
  2. They make satisfactory proof to the court that appointment of a parent as a sole managing conservator or both parents as joint managing conservators would significantly impair the child’s physical health or emotional development.

Grandparent’s Visitation

A grandparent may seek access to a grandchild by original suit or intervention if ALL THREE numbered circumstances exist PLUS one or more of the lettered circumstances exist:

  1. At the time the lawsuit is filed, at least one biological or adoptive parent of the child has not had that parent’s rights terminated; AND
  2. They prove that denial of access to the child would significantly impair the child’s physical health or emotional well-being (this will take more than just saying so … you would need a professional to confirm this); AND
  3. They are a parent of the parent of the child; AND
    1. The parent has been incarcerated in jail or prison during the three month period preceding the filing of the lawsuit; OR
    2. The parent has been found by a court to be incompetent (a separate lawsuit); OR
    3. The parent is dead; OR
    4. The parent does not have actual OR court-ordered possession of or access to the child.

You can see that this statute is very limited. Letters a. through d. severely limits who can file suit. This statute used to include a lettered provision for divorced or separated parents as well as the four you see, but that provision was removed as a result of the Troxel case referred to in my earlier post. You can see what the removal of this provision did to the ability of a grandparent to seek access to the child.

This is simply a quick reference guide to the existing law. If you need help, contact a lawyer to discuss your options. DO NOT simply rely on this post and throw up your hands. There may still be a chance, and until you speak to a lawyer, you will never know.

grandparent’s rights in texas

Friday, October 19th, 2007

There is probably not a hotter topic than grandparent rights in Texas. “Rights” typically refers to the right to have access and/or possession of a grandchild. There are scenarios where a grandparent can seek custody of a grandchild, which I may discuss later, but this topic is on visitation.

The issue of visitation with a grandchild typically does not arise in the context of a healthy family relationship, i.e. mom and dad and child together in a loving home. When that family unit is disrupted, either through divorce, separation, or death is when you will typically run into the situation where a grandparent is alienated from their grandchild. It seems the most common these days is the death of one of the parents of the child. You can imagine how difficult these issues become on the grandparents whose child has died and the surviving parent of the child. It seems that the more time that passes, the more difficult the situation becomes as the surviving parent establishes a new life. It seems to me that these are no win situations as both sides have legitimate arguments and everyone is hurting.

I do not recall grandparent rights cases coming up much early on in my career (in the90′s). That could be because I was a fledgling attorney who did not attract that type of business, or maybe it is the baby boomer thing. In any case, I know about it now and it is a big topic.

Where things seemed to have really sparked was when the U.S. Supreme Court decided Troxel v. Granville in June 2000. The grandparents in this case were the Troxels. They were the paternal grandparents and their son had died. The surviving parent (Granville) allowed visitation with the Troxels but the visitation was limited. The Troxel’s wanted more visitation and sued the mother. The statute In Washington that allowed them to sue provided that “any person” could file a suit seeking visitation of a child and the trial court would grant it if it found it was in the best interest of the child. You can see how broad this statute was…any person? The garbage man? This statute was bound to take a fall, which it did. To finish the story, the grandparents got less visitation than they wanted, but more than the mother wanted to give. She (the mother) appealed it all the way to the Supreme Court of the United States.

The Supreme Court found two problems with the statute as written. First, it in no way took into account the parent’s decisions regarding what was best for the child. The only people that were really involved was the person that filed the lawsuit and the judge who imposed what they thought was best. The second problem was that the grandparent had not proven that the mother was unfit. The Court stated that there was a presumption that a fit parent acted in the best interest of their child. The grandparents apparently did not even address this issue, and why would they because the statute did not require it. The second issue, the presumption, is the big one and is the one that has been used throughout the states and is now the standard here in Texas. Ultimately the Supreme Court found the Washington Statute unconstitutional.

Since Troxel was entered, the Texas courts have been scrambling to determine whether our statutes (as they existed then) were constitutional. In every case they found that it was. I will not go into each case here as most are now obsolete with the new statutes that are in place (to be discussed later). The first case to really adopt the “presumption” discussed above was the In Re: Pensom case out of San Antonio decided in 2003. That is the case that we relied upon for years to determine what we had to prove or disprove and now is reflected in the grandparent visitation statute. Over the years, the legislature has been active in the process as well…honing the grandparent statute so that it will comply more closely with the ruling Troxel. I will discuss the current version of the statute in the next post.