Posts Tagged ‘Modification’

child support contempt and enforcement in Texas

Wednesday, September 22nd, 2010

Child Support contempt

I have many client’s who are confused on when child support is considered late for purposes of contempt of court proceedings.  Most people read their decree literally when it says that support payments are due on the first of the month.  While it is true that it is due on that date, it is not considered late until thirty days have elapsed.

The reason for this is that most people are not paid there entire months check on the first of the month.  They are paid in weekly installments, on the first and fifteenth or every other Friday.

It may be easiest to show you an example:

  1. Donna Divorce is ordered to pay child support to Danny Divorce in the amount of $500 per month, with the first payment being ordered due and payable on September 1, 2010.
  2. Assume Donna is paid on the 1st and 15th of the month (semi-monhtly).
  3. She has submitted an employer’s order to withhold to her employer and they submit the first payment of $250 to the State Disbursement Unit in San Antonio (Attorney General’s Office) on September 1, 2010, the date she is paid.
  4. Obviously Donna did not get the full $500 payment on the 1st.  Is she in contempt?  No.
  5. Why?  Because her employer will submit the remaining $250 on the 15th of the month completing her payments for that month.
  6. That is why there is a thirty day cushion.

That was an easy one.   What if Donna is paid every other Friday (bi-weekly)?

  1. Assume her first paycheck is on September 3rd (a Friday).
  2. Since she is paid bi-weekly the amount that comes out of each check is $230.76.  I will go over how I got that number below.
  3. On September 3rd her employer submits a payment to the disbursement unit of $230.76.
  4. They submit another payment on the 17th of September, her next paycheck date.  Same amount, $230.76.
  5. Her next payment is not until October 1st.
  6. Obviously she is contempt because she only paid $461.52 for the month of September, correct?  That is not correct.
  7. Why?  Because although she may be a bit behind in September, later in the year there will be a month where she pays three time, which would catch her up.  Get it?
  8. For instance in October she will be paid three times instead of two.  For the month of September and October she should have paid $1000.  She paid $461.52 for September, but in October she paid $692.28 (three paychecks that month) for a total over the two months of $1,153.80.
  9. Just like she was not in contempt for September, she does not get money back for September and October.  Why?  Because there will be a month later that she only makes two payments.

At this point you are asking yourself how one would even keep track of this.  Look at it on a yearly basis because no matter how they are paid, weekly, bi-weekly, semi-monthly, or monthly, the number will all equal the same amount at the end of the year.  Per our example above:

  • $500 per month x 12 months = $6,000 for the year.
  • $250 semi monthly (on the 1st and 15th) x 24 payments = $6,000 for the year.
  • $230.76 bi-weekly (every other Friday) x 26 payment = $6,000 for the year.
  • $115.38 weekly x 52 payments = $6000 for the year.

You figure the installments as follows:

  • $500 a month is self explanatory.
  • If a person is paid on the 1st and 15th, then they are paid twice per month.  That is 24 times per year.  $500 divided by two is $250.
  • If person is paid bi-weekly or every other Friday, that is not two payments per month.  As we have seen above, some months are three payments.  Take $500 x 12 months = $6,000.  Divide $6,000 by 52 weeks in a year gives you $115.38 per week.  That number times two is $230.76.
  • The weekly number is $115.38 as just calculated.

I hope I have not made this more confusing because I am trying to help here.  Bottom line, because you do not receive the fully child support payment on the first of the month does not necessarily mean that the other side is in contempt.  There is a thirty day cushion.

child support and the employer’s order to withhold

Tuesday, September 21st, 2010

child support, employer's order, paycheck

A common issue that arises in child support cases is the roll that an obligor’s (person paying child support) employer plays in the payment of child support.  There is a misconception that once an employer’s order to withhold earnings for child support is given to an employer, the obligor is covered on child support.  That cannot be further from the truth.  Let me give you an example:

  1. Danny and Donna Divorce finalize their divorce case on September 21, 2010.  The court signs the final decree of divorce on that day and the employers order to withhold for child support.  The decree and order state that child support begins on October 1, 2010.
  2. Larry Lawyer, who represents Donna, submits the employer’s order to Danny’s employer on October 3, 2010 so that child support comes out of his check.
  3. Danny believes that there is nothing that he needs to do since the order was entered on September 21, 2010 and his child support will come out of his check.  Danny does not even bother checking his paycheck to see if the child support comes out because his paychecks are auto-deposited into his checking account.
  4. Meanwhile, Danny’s employer processes the order and begin withholding child support from his check on November 12, 2010.
  5. Donna is not happy.  She calls her lawyer, Larry, and complains that she has not received a child support payment since the decree was entered.  It is now November 13, 2010.
  6. Larry files a contempt action against Danny for failure to pay his child support for the month of September.
  7. Larry argues that it is supposed to come out of his check and that he did not know that his employer was not withholding the amounts.
  8. Result?  Larry is held in contempt for failing to pay his child support and pays Larry lots of attorney fees.
  9. Why?  Because Danny is responsible for payment of the child support every month regardless of whether his employer withholds it or not.  It is not a defense that his employer screwed up or did not screw up.

The moral of the story.  If you are ordered to pay child support, you are responsible for making the payment every month.  It is up to you to confirm that the correct amounts are coming out of your check.

expanded standard visitation in Texas

Tuesday, July 20th, 2010

What is expanded standard visitation?  The statutes governing expanded standard visitation can be found at Section 153.317 of the Texas Family Code.  To understand expanded standard, you must first understand standard visitation.

A discussion of a standard visitation order for Texas can be found here:

Expanded standard visitation simply adds time on to the standard possession order.  You can elect to add time on to the following times:

Weekend periods of possession, pursuant to §153.317(a)(1)(A) and (B) provides that you can pick up the child when school is dismissed on Friday and/or return the child when the child’s school resumes the following Monday.

Thursday periods of possession, pursuant to §153.317(a)(2)(A) and (B) provides that you can pick up the child when school is dismissed on Thursday and/or return the child when the child’s school resumes the following Friday.

Essentially this creates uninterrupted visitation from the end of school Thursday through the following Monday morning for a parent’s weekend possession.

There are more time available for holiday periods of possession and for extended weekends due to holidays.  These can all be found at §153.317 of the Texas Family Code.

If you notice above, I used the word “elect” for determining when these apply.  Under the code, the parent exercising visitation can “elect” these additional times provided as follows:

  1. The court finds that the expanded standard visitation times are in the best interest of the child; and
  2. The election is made before or at the time that the visitation order is entered; and
  3. The election is written and filed with the court or an oral statement is made in open court (i.e. at a hearing) on the record (a court reporter typing).

What does all that mean?  It means that if you are in a current lawsuit over a visitation order, and the court is ordering a standard possession order, you can elect to have any of the expanded standard visitation times set out in §153.317 if you file a written request with the court or request it at a hearing on the record, and the court thinks it is in the best interest of the child.

The important notes are that the person exercising visitation gets to choose, and that there must be a current lawsuit pending regarding visitation.  You cannot make these elections after an order is entered.